I don't know if any of you guys know this but our new president and his mother wife her mother ect are worthless dirty people. I am not kidding. They used to own apt building in big city and they used to take peoples money and flaunder it for them they are dirty as any other person in office. I do not think we elected him I think someone paid good money to have him be our president. i mean he paid off hillary and she dropped out of office. He is worthless.

And you know this how? Please support your facts.

The question is, how do we know that the other presidents in the past didn't do it? *COUGHBushCOUGH*

The government is corrupt. Barak Obama told alot of lies when running for President, e.g. he told the US People their troops would be out of Iraq by the end of 2010, Never going to happen.

Over here in the UK They are making a law to ban people from using the internet. ITS CALLED THE NEW WORLD ORDER (keep that in your head for a few weeks)

The swine flu vaccine is the killer, I mean swine flu? What makes it different from bird flu and normal flu?!? Its the biggest bull***t ever!

Want to know more? Email me and I will personally give you evidence to support my opinions and godforsaken facts about the US that they don't want anyone to know.

Regards,

Also, you sir are wrong. Dirty? Wow... please support with your facts.

It's not 2010 yet, so chill.

Last time I heard, that was for people who are known to download and share illegal content (Warez, etc.)

Well until I am actually confronted with something on the news, I believe otherwise. He hasn't done anything to make me think he is a "dirty president" thus far.

You are only saying all this because he is black and you are racist.

How would you know this? Support your facts. You might not agree with him but president isn't the easiest job in the world. Him and his family are not dirty or worthless. So chill.

No I am not my family and I have dated black people I love them. Here is the article for where I read this at I hope it helps some of you to see that I am not lying to you all. I am sorry I did not post it when I put this up again I am sorry.





The Obama Administration is taking immigration policies created under Bush and expanding them, much like he’s done with Bush’s war policies, bank bailouts, civil right restrictions (the Patriot Act, torture, unlimited/unchallengeable imprisonment, etc.).

As Obama’s head of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, admits: “We are expanding enforcement, but I think in the right way.” In this case the ‘right way’ is a continuation Bush’s way, though modified for public consumption.

While ending the large, media-attracting factory raids that Bush endorsed, Obama is intensifying “…a shift in federal law enforcement that began under George W. Bush and now has taken a particularly callous turn under President Obama,” according to Tim Rutten of the Los Angeles Times.

Rutten refers specifically to the recent firing of 1,800 mostly immigrant workers in Los Angeles, who suffered the same fate as thousands of others around the country victimized by the Obama administration. Companies that are suspected of hiring immigrants are targeted and closely monitored, “…but instead of concluding with a raid, Immigration and Customs Enforcement simply compels the employers to fire anybody whose papers aren't in order under pain of ruinous civil penalties.” Rutten concluded, “…the most appalling aspect of the Obama administration's wretched conduct of this affair is its studied indifference to the fate of the men and women it has thrown out of work.”

When immigrants are fired from their jobs, they receive no unemployment insurance. Thus, the heavy burden of being jobless during a severe recession is multiplied, and families who’ve lived in the U.S. for years suffer terribly. Obama’s merciless attitude to immigrants was displayed nationally when he proudly declared that, under his health care plan, “illegal immigrants will not qualify.” When asked later about the health care of immigrant children, Obama seemed to show a moment of compassion. Exceptions may be granted, he said, "partly because if you've got children who may be here illegally but are still in playgrounds or at schools, and potentially are passing on illnesses and communicable diseases, that aren't getting vaccinated, that I think is a situation where you may have to make an exception." The President is astonishingly clear: caring for the basic well-being of immigrants or their children is of zero concern.



“… Ms. Napolitano has expanded a program that runs immigration checks on every person booked into local jails in some cities. And she recently announced the expansion of another program, known as 287(g) for the provision of the statute authorizing it, that allows for cooperation between federal immigration agents and state and local police agencies.”

The first policy means that any immigrant that lands in jail for whatever reason faces potential deportation. And although the law was created by Bush to deal with immigrants who committed “serious crimes,” Latino communities have long known this claim to be a fraud. Officers instead arrest immigrants on minor or manufactured charges and alter their lives forever.

The second mentioned program will greatly increase these injustices. Before Bush, immigration laws were enforced by the nationally-run immigration department, with the rationale being that local police were meant to protect and serve communities. Now, local police are being enlisted to hunt down immigrants, most of whom are no danger to anybody and are productive members of their communities.

The dangerous result is that immigrant and Latino families will be pushed further into society’s shadows: they will be less willing to call the police if they witness or fall victim to serious crimes, suffer from domestic violence, or are victims of hate crimes. If they are not paid by their employer — a very regular occurrence — no one will be held accountable.

These types of crimes will be greatly encouraged by Obama’s new policy, alongside another form of abuse. Many Latino communities have become familiar with police picking up suspected immigrants off the street and sending them to deportation facilities — even though no crime has been committed. Knowing that these racial profiling abuses would likely increase with local police becoming immigration enforcers, the Obama Administration gave lip-service to the increased “oversight” of the expanded policy, but little action is likely to follow, and civil rights violations will almost certainly increase.

Another Bush policy being expanded under Obama is the controversial E-verify system, which gives governmental access to employers' employment records, with the intention of verifying the legitimate documents of employees. Aside from the above-mentioned hardships this is already creating for thousands of families, the system is accused of being highly dysfunctional and error-ridden, like its predecessor the “no match" letter.

"No match" letters were mailed to workers and employers alike to notify them that a worker’s social security number didn’t match — implying that the worker was using a fake number to gain employment. The "no match" system was recently scrapped, likely due to the enormous number of errors it committed and consequent outcry (I can personally attest that the system was flawed, as my Caucasian, Indiana-born domestic partner received such a letter).

Obama’s policies do represent a drastic swerve to the right on the issue of immigration, but, on the other hand, he’s just following the Democratic Party line, which is itself becoming hysterically anti-immigrant. High ranking Democrat Charles Schumer is leading the Democrat offensive, helping create a highly punitive “immigration reform” bill that includes Bush-era border militarization.

So far, this bill consists only of “general principles," polices agreed upon to appease big business sectors that benefits from immigrant labor. Highly skilled immigrants will be favored and the lower skilled deported; some immigrants will be allowed to stay and work, while others are hunted down like animals. This divide and conquer strategy has already won over some immigrant and labor groups, who wrongly view the bill as “a step in the right direction.” The Democrats have spoken at length about their immigration philosophy; they want to provide corporations with sufficient cheap labor while demonizing “undesirable” immigrants.

Why the right turn? Since having taken power of both Congress and the Presidency, the Democrats have proven to be a very proficient tool for the corporate elite, following much of the same polices created by Bush.

The enormous public anger over these policies creates in the Democrats an urgent need for distraction. Rather than focus on the super-rich that are profiting from the recession and the politicians feeding them trillions in tax dollars, the Democrats would rather have our scorn funneled toward society’s most vulnerable population.

Always left out in the immigration discussion are the factors that drive immigrants to enter the U.S. at all. U.S. corporate-controlled foreign policy — under NAFTA and CAFTA — forced cheaply produced U.S. goods into the markets of poor countries to the south. Impoverished farmers and others were forced out of their country (where they would rather have stayed) to feed themselves and their families. U.S. corporations took further advantage of the situation by paying slave wages across the border and by paying immigrants in the U.S. below-poverty wages with no benefits. Workers who speak out against these injustices can be conveniently deported.

Consequently, wages for both U.S. and Latin American workers are lowered. The scapegoating of immigrants is absolutely crucial to the functionality of this strategy.

Therefore, the only progressive solution to immigration is to unite all workers against the planned corporate offensive: CAFTA and NAFTA must be eliminated, and all workers in the U.S. must be given not only equal rights, but a livable wage. To achieve this, unions must fight harder to organize not only immigrants, but the millions of other workers who have little or no rights on the job. By doing so, corporations will be unable to exploit any worker so as to lower the wages of all workers. These lofty goals would be easier to accomplish if immigrant and labor groups diverted their energy and resources away from the Democratic Party, so that they could be used instead for real social change.





President-Elect Barack Obama (D-IL): As Barack Obama assumes the presidency he already brings to the White House a large amount of ethical baggage. Obama's presidential campaign had some of the ethical trimmings of a Chicago ward election. It was marked with enormous corruption issues, ranging from its alliance with the sleazy ACORN operation's "voter registration" and "get out the vote" efforts to its acceptance of untraceable, and in too many cases, illegal online contributions. There are also Obama's corrupt dealings with convicted felon Tony Rezko and unrepentant terrorist William Ayers, his below-market rate mortgage loans, his stock dealings and related "earmark" votes in the U.S. Senate, and his missing or non-existent official papers from his years in the Illinois State Senate. His ongoing cover up of his and his team's role in the Blagojevich "pay-to-play" scandal is ruining his presidency even before he takes the oath of office.

You're a baddass man. I mean - you're using colored font (gasp). No but really - just because you've heard a ton of hyped up bullshit by internet enthusiasts it doesn't mean anything. The New World Order idea has been around for ages and guess what - it's just another conspirator gone bullshitting. If you have proof - just post it here. That way we can all argue with it.

-- Q

I did post proof if you can't see it I don't know why that is. I don't trust anyone though because all they do is let you down. So maybe he can redeem him self. I think my self that we need women in office then things will really get done. If I knew anything about any of that stuff I would see if I could find someone to run. But I know that things will not be right until we get someone that really cares in there and dude in there now is not what we need. We need to elect a women to be our president and then I think that things will be done right and kept right but I don't think that will happen but I am hoping that it will.

It doesn't matter if the President is a woman or man - and if you think that I do hope you aren't old enough to vote.

Please link me to this proof - oh please great internet e-enthusiast.

-- Q

No do it your self. You can do search on google.com for it and yes it does matter it matters very much. Men are selfish and only care about them selves. Women for made to have big hearts and care about others. Why do you think we stick around for our kids when you men run away. Women take care of others not just them selves. Men only think of them selves. That is why I say that people should put women in office. And don't talk crap about me. You don't like what I have to say then go away. DON'T JUDGE ME!!!!

I will judge you as what I see - an over enthusiastic retard who is willing to eat up anything.

Not one article popped up which is a reliable source in my eyes and I have yet to see proof. A link on Google isn't proof - sorry mister.

-- Q

First off I am female. And you think I care what you have to say. Someone that has no life and spends day and night on this forum talking crap about people and to people. You want to fight and act like little boy then send it is personal message. I would love to fight with you some in there but not on this forum get a life.

I have a life. You posted your opinion and I am posting mine. And how was I to be aware that you are a female - I'm sorry for the misunderstanding. Also note I joined this forum hours ago - I fail to see the "day and night" aspect of it. Please control yourself - as you said... this is only a forum.

So - ready to back up your claims yet? Till you do I have come to assume you are just here to lie to us.

-- Q

Sir I don't have to do crap. Stop being lazy and look stuff up. It is common since he is lying POS you can see it on the news. People in war still for bunch of people no one gives a crap about. I could see go over there kill the losers that bombed us but not to take over their right to live. If you can't see that then you should not be able to vote.

Who says I am a man? I don't like assumptions. Don't believe everything the media says - I mean some of the News stations don't support women-voting so how does that make you feel? And I am not lazy. I Googled what you asked me to and I have yet to find any evidence. I have come the conclusion you are biased and you have no proof of your claims. I'm waiting.

-- Q

chill people,I dont think this forums is good to hear kind of fighting,and if it is right Obama is dirty people,let the law speak the fact,it so much wasting energy here doing so ,when it wont lead to no where but another flaw opinion